Logo image
A threat-complexity hypothesis of conspiracy thinking during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-national and longitudinal evidence of a three-way interaction effect of financial strain, disempowerment and paranoia
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A threat-complexity hypothesis of conspiracy thinking during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-national and longitudinal evidence of a three-way interaction effect of financial strain, disempowerment and paranoia

Gennaro Pica, N. Pontus Leander, Hadi Sam Nariman, Márton Hadarics, Daniel W. Snook, Jocelyn J. Bélanger, Marika Rullo, Ameni Mehrez, Antonio Pierro, Robbie M. Sutton, …
Journal of social and personal relationships, Vol.42(7)
03-20-2025

Abstract

Conspiracy thinking financial strain disempowerment paranoia COVID-19 pandemic
One way to cope with crises is by attributing their ultimate causes to malevolent conspiracies. As crises are rarely simple, and may involve an interplay between multiple, co-occurring threats, we suggest that conspiracy thinking mainly occurs among individuals who experience conditions of threat complexity – such as socioeconomic vulnerability paired with a sense of helplessness in society, and who are also sufficiently paranoid to infer a conspiracy. In the present study, we focused on financial strain and disempowerment, as two relevant threats which were both dramatically affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and hypothesized a three-way interaction between financial strain, disempowerment and paranoia in predicting conspiracy thinking. This hypothesis was supported in both cross-national ( N = 64,130) and longitudinal data ( N = 11,159), collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. Implications of the results for understanding the tendency to reduce multiple threats to a single cause are discussed.
url
Link to published article.View

Related links

Metrics

6 Record Views

Details

Logo image