Abstract
The Marxist critique that existentialism is an academic affair that ignores historical, economic, and socio-political determinations is largely misguided, while Marxism, criticized as a doctrinaire “grand narrative,” marginalizes subjectivity and individual choice in the name of complete determination and teleology. The existentialist objection to Marxian theory – like its converse – is based on a limited understanding, but it may still offer a beneficial corrective influence. This work suggests a synthesis – in the sense of mutual recognition and correction – is both possible and beneficial for both traditions.