Abstract
While there has been substantial interest in benchmark beating behavior, relatively little research examines differences between interim and fourth quarters. Potential differences exist because managers likely have different opportunities and incentives to manage earnings in interim versus fourth quarters. In addition, audit firms are more engaged in fourth quarters compared to interim quarters. We test three hypotheses using two earnings benchmarks: small earnings increases and zero earnings levels. First, we predict and find that the likelihood of benchmark beating behavior is lower in fourth than interim quarters. Second, we predict and find that for interim quarters, the likelihood of benchmark beating behavior is lower for Big N firm clients compared to regional firm or national firm clients. Third, we predict and find that compared to national and regional firms, Big N firms have a greater effect on lessening fourth-quarter over interim-quarter benchmark beating. Implications of our findings are discussed.