Logo image
First Pregnancy Abortion or Natural Pregnancy Loss: A Cohort Study of Mental Health Services Utilization
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

First Pregnancy Abortion or Natural Pregnancy Loss: A Cohort Study of Mental Health Services Utilization

James Studnicki, Tessa Longbons Cox, John W Fisher, Christina A Cirucci, David C Reardon, Ingrid Skop, Christopher Craver, Maka Tsulukidze and Zbigniew Ras
Issues in law & medicine, Vol.39(2), p.100
10-15-2024

Abstract

While both induced abortion and natural pregnancy loss have been associated with subsequent mental health problems, population-based studies directly comparing these two pregnancy outcomes are rare. We sought to compare mental health morbidity after an induced abortion or natural loss.IntroductionWhile both induced abortion and natural pregnancy loss have been associated with subsequent mental health problems, population-based studies directly comparing these two pregnancy outcomes are rare. We sought to compare mental health morbidity after an induced abortion or natural loss.Continuously eligible Medicaid beneficiaries age 16 in 1999 were assigned to two cohorts based upon the first pregnancy outcome: abortion (n = 1,331) or natural loss (n = 605). Outcomes were mental health outpatient visits, inpatient hospital admissions and hospital days of stay per patient per year. Average exposure periods before and after the first pregnancy outcome for each cohort were used to adjust the mental health service rates.MethodsContinuously eligible Medicaid beneficiaries age 16 in 1999 were assigned to two cohorts based upon the first pregnancy outcome: abortion (n = 1,331) or natural loss (n = 605). Outcomes were mental health outpatient visits, inpatient hospital admissions and hospital days of stay per patient per year. Average exposure periods before and after the first pregnancy outcome for each cohort were used to adjust the mental health service rates.Prior to the first pregnancy outcome, all three utilization rates were significantly higher for the natural loss cohort compared to the abortion cohort. For the abortion cohort, the per-patient per-year increase from the pre- to post-pregnancy periods was significant for all three rates: 2.04 times for outpatient visits (p < 0.0001), 3.04 times for inpatient admissions (p = 0.0003), and 3.01 times for hospital days of stay (p = 0.0112). None of the pre-to-post rate increases were significant for the natural loss cohort.ResultsPrior to the first pregnancy outcome, all three utilization rates were significantly higher for the natural loss cohort compared to the abortion cohort. For the abortion cohort, the per-patient per-year increase from the pre- to post-pregnancy periods was significant for all three rates: 2.04 times for outpatient visits (p < 0.0001), 3.04 times for inpatient admissions (p = 0.0003), and 3.01 times for hospital days of stay (p = 0.0112). None of the pre-to-post rate increases were significant for the natural loss cohort.Higher pre-pregnancy use rates for women who experience a natural pregnancy loss indicate that increased mental health services use following abortion cannot be solely attributed to pre-existing mental illness. Only the abortion cohort, but not the natural loss cohort, experienced significant increases in mental health services use following the first pregnancy outcome.ConclusionHigher pre-pregnancy use rates for women who experience a natural pregnancy loss indicate that increased mental health services use following abortion cannot be solely attributed to pre-existing mental illness. Only the abortion cohort, but not the natural loss cohort, experienced significant increases in mental health services use following the first pregnancy outcome.
url
Link to published article.View
Published (Version of record) Open

Related links

Metrics

14 Record Views

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
Logo image