Logo image
Political polarization of conservation issues in the era of COVID-19: An examination of partisan perspectives and priorities in the United States
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Political polarization of conservation issues in the era of COVID-19: An examination of partisan perspectives and priorities in the United States

William R Casola, Justin M Beall, M Nils Peterson, Lincoln R Larson, S Brent Jackson and Kathryn T Stevenson
Journal for nature conservation, Vol.67, pp.126176-126176
06-2022
PMID: 35370533

Abstract

Coronavirus Policy Political Ideology Political Polarization Zoonoses Public Opinion
•We asked US residents about 14 policy issues during the 2020 US general election.•The importance of conservation issues increased as a result of COVID-19.•But, the importance of conservation issues decreased relative to other issues.•Conservation issues ranked low in overall importance in the 2020 US general election.•COVID-19 increased polarization surrounding the importance of conservation issues. As a zoonotic disease with unprecedented global impacts, COVID-19 may influence how people prioritize issues related to wildlife conservation. Using a nationally representative sample of US residents, we investigated: (1) how COVID-19 affected the relative importance of conservation issues among adults with different political ideologies, and (2) how the pandemic affected political polarization of conservation issues during the 2020 general election in the United States. Conservation issues such as endangered species and controlling zoonotic disease ranked low in importance among the 14 policy issues considered, even lower than environmental issues such as climate change and environmental protection; however, the importance of all conservation issues increased as a result of COVID-19. Political polarization surrounding the perceived importance of conservation issues also increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, with Democrats reporting larger increases in importance than Republicans. Polarization was driven by the most conservative Republicans and the most liberal Democrats. But this polarization was less extreme than it was for other issues such as climate change and healthcare. Findings highlight the need for communicating links between zoonotic disease and human interactions with wildlife and the environment. Acting quickly may be critical in areas where conservation issues are primed to succumb to political polarization.
url
Link to journal article.View

Related links

Metrics

14 Record Views
16 Times Cited - Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#13 Climate Action
#15 Life on Land

Source: SDGs in the Output

Logo image