Abstract
During economic crises, urban policymakers must assess whether housing assistance helps prevent
evictions. This study explores the link between housing assistance and eviction risk and how
household financial capacity influences this relationship. Using 207,203 observations from the
Understanding America Study during COVID-19 and applying recursive bivariate probit models
with instrumental variables, we find that housing assistance correlates with a 4.3% decrease in the
likelihood of eviction (a 15.6% relative reduction). Notably, among households with credit access,
this effect increases to 6.2%, or 44% more than the overall average. We observe a notable inverted-
U pattern: households with one to two credit sources see reductions over 39%, whereas those with
three or more sources experience much smaller effects, around 4.1%, or a nearly tenfold difference.
This challenges the idea that greater financial access always enhances outcomes. The mechanism
analysis suggests that this pattern reflects financial stability rather than over-leveraging:
households with three or more credit sources tend to be more creditworthy and less dependent on
assistance. The results hold across various estimation methods. Although our instrumental variable
approach has limitations, the consistent heterogeneity patterns across multiple strategies increase
confidence in the finding that housing assistance and moderate credit access work well together.
These insights imply that housing assistance programs could be more effective when combined
with financial inclusion efforts that focus on credit quality over quantity, with important
implications for preventing urban displacement during economic downturns.
Keywords: housing assistance, eviction prevention, financial capacity, instrumental variables, and
urban policy.
JEL Codes: I38, R21, R28, C26, H53.