Logo image
Efficacy of potentiation of performance through overweight implement throws on male and female collegiate and elite weight throwers
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Efficacy of potentiation of performance through overweight implement throws on male and female collegiate and elite weight throwers

David Bellar, Lawrence W Judge, Mike Turk and Mike Judge
Journal of strength and conditioning research, Vol.26(6), pp.1469-1474
06-2012
PMID: 21904242

Abstract

Athletes Athletic Performance - physiology Body Weight Exercise - physiology Female Humans Male Muscle Strength - physiology Overweight - physiopathology Resistance Training Weight Lifting - physiology Young Adult
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the acute effects of 2 different overweight implements on weight throw performance. Seventeen collegiate and elite weight throwers were recruited to participate. A within-subject design was used to compare the difference between mean and peak distance after warm-up with a regulation weight (STAND), 1.37-kg overweight (OVRWGHT1), and 2.27-kg overweight implement (OVRWGHT2). Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a main effect for Treatment (p = 0.006) and a significant interaction effect for Treatment by Time (p = 0.041). The means for the OVRWGHT1 treatment (16.08 ± 2.5 m) and OVRWGHT2 (16.08 ± 2.7 m) were not different; however, the mean for STAND was significantly lower than that for the other treatments (15.58 ± 2.5, p < 0.02). Changes in performance between OVRWGHT treatments and STAND were found to correlate to one-repetition maximum (1RM) Power Clean (improvement for OVRWGHT 1, r = 0.536, p = 0.016; improvement for OVRWGHT2, r = 0.548, p = 0.014). The results suggest that in collegiate and elite athletes overweight implement warm-up may improve performance and that stronger athletes may be better suited to take advantage of this effect.
url
Link to journal article.View

Related links

Metrics

Details

Logo image